Hi, You can generally see what the reason is from the archive page, where it says: A summary of the most recent check results can be obtained from the check results archive.
On that page, https://cran-archive.r-project.org/web/checks/2023/2023-08-19_check_results_prqlr.html is the note: Version: 0.5.0 Check: installed package size Result: NOTE installed size is 18.5Mb sub-directories of 1Mb or more: libs 18.2Mb This is too big for CRAN, see https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/policies.html quoted here: Packages should be of the minimum necessary size. Reasonable compression should be used for data (not just .rda files) and PDF documentation: CRAN will if necessary pass the latter through qpdf. As a general rule, neither data nor documentation should exceed 5MB (which covers several books). A CRAN package is not an appropriate way to distribute course notes, and authors will be asked to trim their documentation to a maximum of 5MB. Where a large amount of data is required (even after compression), consideration should be given to a separate data-only package which can be updated only rarely (since older versions of packages are archived in perpetuity). Similar considerations apply to other forms of “data”, e.g., .jar files. Source package tarballs should if possible not exceed 10MB. It is much preferred that third-party source software should be included within the package (as e.g. a vendor.tar.xz file) than be downloaded at installation: if this requires a larger tarball a modestly increased limit can be requested at submission. Sarah On Sat, Aug 26, 2023 at 4:26 PM SHIMA Tatsuya <ts1s1a...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > I noticed that my submitted package `prqlr` 0.5.0 was archived from CRAN > on 2023-08-19. > <https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=prqlr> > > I submitted prqlr 0.5.0 on 2023-08-13. I believe I have since only > received word from CRAN that it passed the automated release process. > <https://github.com/eitsupi/prqlr/pull/161> > So I was very surprised to find out after I returned from my trip that > this was archived. > > The CRAN page says "Archived on 2023-08-19 for policy violation. " but I > don't know what exactly was the problem. > I have no idea what more to fix as I believe I have solved all the > problems when I submitted 0.5.0. > > Is there any way to know what exactly was the problem? > (I thought I sent an e-mail to CRAN 5 days ago but have not yet received > an answer, so I decided to ask my question on this mailing list, > thinking that there is a possibility that there will be no answer to my > e-mail, although I may have to wait a few weeks for an answer. My > apologies if this idea is incorrect.) > > Best, > Tatsuya > > ______________________________________________ > R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel -- Sarah Goslee (she/her) http://www.sarahgoslee.com ______________________________________________ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel