Thanks a lot. I don't have a physical linux box and so I need to use rhub. But I don't know why there are no "-Ex.timings" files in the check. E.g,
check(platform = "debian-gcc-release", show_status = FALSE, check_args = "--as-cran") I can only see these files in artifacts: [ ] 00check.log 2023-09-20 08:00 3.4K [ ] 00install.out 2023-09-20 08:00 702 [ ] Rdlatex.log 2023-09-20 08:00 30K [ ] modelbpp-Ex.Rout 2023-09-20 08:00 28K [ ] modelbpp-manual.log 2023-09-20 08:00 19K The case is the same for this, no "-Ex.timings" files: check(platform = "windows-x86_64-release", show_status = FALSE, check_args = "--as-cran") Although I think I need to, I tried adding "--timings" but still do not see the "-Ex.timings". However, if I run the check locally in Windows 10 using R CMD check with --as-cran, I can find the "-Ex.timings" files. I can find the total time at the end of "-Ex.Rout" but I think this is not what I need: > base::cat("Time elapsed: ", proc.time() - base::get("ptime", pos = > 'CheckExEnv'),"\n") Time elapsed: 10.963 0.161 13.589 0.302 0.081 Regards, Shu Fai On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 5:59 PM Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.dun...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 18/09/2023 10:10 a.m., Shu Fai Cheung wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I know we should not use more than 2 cores in tests, vignettes, etc. I > > encountered and solved this issue before. However, I still committed > > this mistake in a new package and would like find out where the cause > > is. > > > > I have a package that already has parallel processing disabled by > > default and I did not enable parallel processing in the examples and > > tests (except for one test, which is always skipped by skip()). > > However, I was told that somewhere in the package more than 2 cores > > are used. > > > > I checked several times and even added a temporary 'stop()` to "trap" > > parallel processing but still could not find where the source of the > > problem is. > > > > I checked the timing in the log in R CMD check results from winbuilder > > but everything seems OK. The user time and elapsed time are similar > > for all the examples. > > > > Is there any quick way to check where things go wrong regarding the > > number of cores? It is not easy to find the source of the problems > > when there are many examples and tests. > > If you run R CMD check <pkg> at the command line, it will produce a > directory *.Rcheck containing a number of files. One of those files > will be *-Ex.timings, which will give the individual timings of each of > the examples in your package. Maybe you can recognize from those which > of the examples are problematic ones, and add `proc.time()` calls to the > example to figure out which line(s) cause the issue. > > I don't remember whether winbuilder keeps the timings file when it runs > a check. > > Duncan Murdoch > ______________________________________________ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel