On 3 November 2024 at 11:02, Tiago Olivoto wrote: | Today, I noticed that several stable packages, such as Rcpp and sf, were | unavailable during the check process for this submission. This wasn’t an | issue in the previously published version of pliman. Could this be a | temporary problem with the package availability on CRAN?
I could be. (Auto-)build systems for 21k packages and 3 architectures can be fragile, and we are in time of transition (R 4.4.2 just came about) so this could have been spurious. If in doubt, check the status of a given package at its CRAN page. But I looked at the log links yu provided, and I saw no build failure over 'missing Rcpp and/or sf' there. Can you point us to an error? Moreover, reading https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/pliman_3.0.0_20241102_181842/specialChecks/noSuggests/summary.txt I do not see your aforementioned 'check_ebi()' function at work. The suggested package is not present, you are asked to not fail and just skip but do not seem to do so. I think you need to fix that, and that the CRAN messaging is fairly clear and standard here. I may of course have missed something in which case 'my bad'. Dirk -- dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org ______________________________________________ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
