On Wednesday, May 14th, 2025 at 12:59 PM, Ben Bolker <bbol...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 12:46 PM Dirk Eddelbuettel e...@debian.org wrote: > > > [ If you could, please set your email software up such that posts to a > > mailing lists are not signed, it makes reading them more cumbersome. It > > also means I can't reply (easily) inline now. ] > > > > In most cases environment variables need to be set before the process > > starts. Setting them inside the running R process likely has no effect. > > > That's what I thought, although it means then (I assume) that you > have to rely on whatever settings CRAN has determined for its testing > platforms. The RhpcBLASctl package > https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=RhpcBLASctl can do some of these > settings within a running R process, I don't know if it does what you > need or not. Thanks for the package reference. The description is promising, but using it still resulted in non-identical objects. All of this leads me to think that the lack of control over the CRAN platforms and the difficulty (if not impossibility) of testing what I want to test mean that it is reasonable to remove my attempts to test it from the package that I upload to CRAN. Thoughts? ______________________________________________ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
