On 3 June 2025 at 15:36, Sebastian Meyer wrote: | Am 03.06.25 um 13:22 schrieb Greg Hunt: | > Dirk, | > Even if he gets the test and example times to zero, his total time in that | > thirteen minute run is still above ten minutes. In my view the incomplete | > time reporting (we don't know what makes up the thirteen minutes) is a bug | > in the build process. | | It is indeed unfortunate and perhaps a bug that the Windows check log | shows no runtime for
Oh I see. Well I always took mine 'on another OS' as 'largely proportional' which allowed me to, say, reduce overall test time by 50%. It also helps that the testing framework I default to (tinytest, which I can strongly recommend) defaults to showing test times so I generally have an idea about relative 'cost' between different tests. R itself adds timings to the test log but that is (arguably) rather hidden. | > * checking whether package 'secr' can be installed ... OK | | (which on the Debian check machine was reported with 164s) | | as well as for the following checks of package loading | (which takes relatively long for 'secr', even on Linux, ~5s each): | | > * checking whether the package can be loaded ... OK | > * checking whether the package can be loaded with stated dependencies ... OK | > * checking whether the package can be unloaded cleanly ... OK | > * checking whether the namespace can be loaded with stated dependencies ... OK | > * checking whether the namespace can be unloaded cleanly ... OK | > * checking loading without being on the library search path ... OK | > * checking whether startup messages can be suppressed ... OK | | Setting environment variable _R_CHECK_TIMINGS_=0 should reveal timings | for these checks. (Check option --as-cran only shows timings above 10s | by default.) I don't currently have a Windows machine at hand to test. In general I think a policy of 'be more verbose' and 'have more generally useful options on by default' would help. This thread seems to show there may be a need. Cheers, Dirk -- dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org ______________________________________________ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel