On 2025-08-27 2:22 p.m., Spencer Graves wrote:
Hello, All:
"CRAN Package Check Results for Package Ecdat"[1] flags a "NOTE" on all
platforms. I don't understand any of them.
For example, the check results from some but not all platforms include:
** No Authors@R field in DESCRIPTION.
Please add one, modifying
Authors@R: c(person(given = "Yves",
family = "Croissant",
role = "aut",
email = "[email protected]"),
person(given = "Spencer",
family = "Graves",
role = c("aut", "cre"),
email = "[email protected]"))
as necessary.
** The DESCRIPTION file includes exactly this Author@R field, which
seems to be what they want, but which I read as complaining it's not
there. ???
Version 0.4-2 didn't include that. The link you sent points to check
results for that version (which was uploaded in 2022).
** Some of these check results also complain about "Lost braces". The
braces seem to be there with the standard syntax that I understand from
what I read in "Writing R Extensions".
I think the "lost braces" are unnecessary braces. For example, you have
\doi{10.18128/D010.V10.0}{IPUMS USA: Version 10.0 [dataset].
Minneapolis, MN: IPUMS}
as though \doi{} needs two arguments, but it only needs one.
** "Found the following Rd file(s) with Rd \link{} targets missing
package anchors:
USFinanceIndustry.Rd: readNIPA"
** In that Rd file, I find "\code{\link[Ecfun]{readNIPA}}"
In 0.4-2 you have
\seealso{
\code{\link{readNIPA}}
}
Duncan Murdoch
What am I missing? Thanks, Spencer Graves
[1]
https://cran.rstudio.com//web/checks/check_results_Ecdat.html
______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
