Thanks for all the tips.

@josiah I'm aware of cransays (It's not a shiny app by the way, it uses pkgdown 
in combination with GH pages). When I checked it, I missed the paginating 
button at the bottom. So a silly mistake on my behalf.

@Dirk I was not aware of the 'ciw' package. I will give it a try.

General conclusion is that I need to double check before bothering other people 
;).

Pepijn

________________________________________
Van: Dirk Eddelbuettel <e...@debian.org>
Verzonden: woensdag 27 augustus 2025 13:28
Aan: Michael Dewey <li...@dewey.myzen.co.uk>
CC: Josiah Parry <josiah.pa...@gmail.com>; Pepijn de Vries 
<pepijn.devr...@outlook.com>; Ivan Krylov via R-package-devel 
<r-package-devel@r-project.org>
Onderwerp: Re: [R-pkg-devel] Svar: CRAN submission status lost
 

On 27 August 2025 at 10:54, Michael Dewey wrote:
| There is also the CRAN package foghorn with, amongst others, the handy
| cran_incoming function.

There is also the 'ciw' package with its 'ciw()' (== 'CRAN Incoming Watcher')
function that is a little lighter and faster.

Which is yseful for a quick run at the R prompt, or, via the `littler`
wrapper ciw.r at the command-line, which is what I do. 

$ ciw.r
     Folder                       Name                Time   Size          Age
     <char>                     <char>              <POSc> <char>   <difftime>
 1: pretest    DendroSync_0.1.5.tar.gz 2025-08-27 13:19:00    32K   0.08 hours
 2: pretest       cobin_1.0.1.3.tar.gz 2025-08-27 13:11:00    34K   0.22 hours
 3: waiting    azuremapsr_0.0.2.tar.gz 2025-08-27 12:09:00    14K   1.25 hours
 4: waiting         CTxCC_0.4.0.tar.gz 2025-08-27 05:21:00    12K   8.05 hours
 5: waiting      capybara_1.7.0.tar.gz 2025-08-27 03:17:00   367K  10.12 hours
 6: waiting          Hmsc_3.3-7.tar.gz 2025-08-26 20:29:00   2.4M  16.92 hours
 7: waiting       fingerPro_2.0.tar.gz 2025-08-26 15:55:00    64K  21.48 hours
 8: waiting   treespace_1.1.4.4.tar.gz 2025-08-26 14:33:00   7.6M  22.85 hours
 9: waiting MplusAutomation_1.2.tar.gz 2025-08-26 14:14:00   1.5M  23.17 hours
10: waiting    rasterVis_0.51.7.tar.gz 2025-08-24 07:37:00    49K  77.78 hours
11: waiting     KbMvtSkew_1.1.0.tar.gz 2025-08-23 00:35:00    13K 108.82 hours
12: waiting      bipartite_2.22.tar.gz 2025-08-21 14:54:00   4.3M 142.50 hours
$

Default settings stop at 168 hours, 50 packages, and skip 'newbies', all that
can be overriden via command-libe flags to 'ciw,r' or arguments to
'ciw::ciw()'. It also sorts the display by 'Age' so often you see the states
'pretest', 'waiting', 'recheck' and 'inspect' intermixed.

$ ciw.r -h
Usage: ciw.r [-h] [-x] [-a] [-m] [-i] [-t] [-p] [-w] [-r] [-s] [-n] [-u] [-l 
rows] [-g age] [-z] [ARG...]

-m --mega           use 'mega' mode of all folders (see --usage)
-i --inspect        visit 'inspect' folder
-t --pretest        visit 'pretest' folder
-p --pending        visit 'pending' folder
-w --waiting        visit 'waiting' folder
-r --recheck        visit 'recheck' folder
-a --archive        visit 'archive' folder
-n --newbies        visit 'newbies' folder
-u --publish        visit 'publish' folder
-s --skipsort       skip sorting of aggregate results by age
-l --lines rows     print top 'rows' of the result object [default: 50]
-g --max age        print only package less than 'age' hours old [default: 168]
-z --ping           run the connectivity check first
-h --help           show this help text
-x --usage          show help and short example usage
$

Dirk

|
| Michael
|
| On 26/08/2025 20:02, Josiah Parry wrote:
| > Pepijn, I bookmarked this shiny app a while ago:
| > https://r-hub.github.io/cransays/articles/dashboard.html
| >
| > super helpful for the "is it just me? Did i miss something?" view. It lets
| > you see if other people have been waiting as well.
| >
| > On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 2:03 AM Pepijn de Vries <pepijn.devr...@outlook.com>
| > wrote:
| >
| >> Hi Both,
| >>
| >> Thanks for the quick response. Indeed, it was my bad. I overlooked the
| >> listing at CRAN incoming due to the sorting. I will patiently await the
| >> report of the manual inspection.
| >>
| >> Pepijn
| >>
| >>
| >> ________________________________________
| >> Van: Uwe Ligges
| >> Verzonden: Maandag, 25 Augustus, 2025 10:02
| >> Aan: Kristian Hovde Liland; Pepijn de Vries; Ivan Krylov via
| >> R-package-devel
| >> Onderwerp: Re: [R-pkg-devel] Svar: CRAN submission status lost
| >>
| >>
| >> Indeed, as the auto notification says "A CRAN team member will typically
| >>
| >> respond to you within the next 10 working days." Only two passed so far.
| >>
| >> CRAN received > 100 newbie submissions within three days.
| >>
| >>
| >>
| >> Best,
| >>
| >> Uwe Ligges
| >>
| >>
| >>
| >>
| >>
| >> On 25.08.2025 08:53, Kristian Hovde Liland wrote:
| >>
| >>> Hi Pepijn,
| >>
| >>>
| >>
| >>> You can see your package at https://cran.r-project.org/incoming/newbies/.
| >> Note that sorting is a bit special with capital first letters first, then
| >> packages with small first letters. It has only been four days according to
| >> the date stamp, so maybe give it a couple more days.
| >>
| >>>
| >>
| >>> Regards,
| >>
| >>> Kristian
| >>
| >>>
| >>
| >>> Fra: R-package-devel <r-package-devel-boun...@r-project.org> p� vegne
| >> av Pepijn de Vries <pepijn.devr...@outlook.com>
| >>
| >>> Dato: mandag, 25. august 2025 kl. 08:45
| >>
| >>> Til: Ivan Krylov via R-package-devel <r-package-devel@r-project.org>
| >>
| >>> Emne: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN submission status lost
| >>
| >>>
| >>
| >>> Hi,
| >>
| >>>
| >>
| >>> After submitting a newbie package to CRAN, I received a notification
| >> after the automatic checks that it was pending a manual check.
| >>
| >>> However, I haven't heard back from CRAN since. Also, it is nowhere to be
| >> found on <https://cran.r-project.org/incoming/>
| >>
| >>>
| >>
| >>> Should I wait to receive a report on the manual check, or should I
| >> contact CRAN?
| >>
| >>>
| >>
| >>> P.S., Results of the automatic check are here:
| >>
| >>> <
| >> 
https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/blosc_0.0.5_20250821_234040/
| >>>
| >>
| >>>
| >>
| >>> ______________________________________________
| >>
| >>> R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
| >>
| >>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
| >>
| >>>
| >>
| >>>         [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
| >>
| >>>
| >>
| >>>
| >>
| >>> ______________________________________________
| >>
| >>> R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
| >>
| >>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
| >>
| >>
| >>
| >> ______________________________________________
| >> R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
| >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
| >>
| >
| >      [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
| >
| > ______________________________________________
| > R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
| > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
|
| --
| Michael Dewey
|
| ______________________________________________
| R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
| https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

--
dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org
______________________________________________
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

Reply via email to