В Fri, 19 Sep 2025 09:09:01 -0400 Jarrett Phillips <phillipsjarre...@gmail.com> пишет:
> Check: CRAN incoming feasibility, Result: NOTE > Maintainer: 'Jarrett D. Phillips <phillipsjarre...@gmail.com>' > > Size of tarball: 13246681 bytes > The NOTE regarding the maintainer field has never been altered > previously, and it looks syntactically fine on the surface. The maintainer information is a bit of a red herring. It is always collected by this check (before 2014, it was printed with a NOTE, then a 'Note_to_CRAN_maintainers' until 2024 to avoid returning a NOTE for an otherwise perfect check result); nowadays it's hidden with an OK status unless something else is not right. Here, the NOTE is due to the size of the source package being too large. Is there anything that can be trimmed down? Currently, the CRAN policy limits data and documentation to 5 MB each and the source package tarball to 10 MB. > For the WARNING, I edited the NAMESPACE to use `import` rather than > `importFrom`, but that didn't fix things. As noted by Duncan Murdoch, it's better to use more specific imports of individual functions (e.g. importFrom(shinydashboardPlus, dashboardHeader) but not importFrom(shinydashboard, dashboardHeader) at the same time) than less specific imports of the whole package namespace (e.g. import(shinydashboard, shinydashboardPlus) and cause conflicts) to avoid this warning. -- Best regards, Ivan ______________________________________________ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
