В Wed, 11 Feb 2026 10:17:31 -0800 Josiah Parry <[email protected]> пишет:
> Is this a “blip” in the check system? Or am I missing something and > am at risk of archival? Something's not right with r-devel-macos-arm64. For many packages, <https://www.r-project.org/nosvn/R.check/r-devel-macos-arm64/PACKAGE-00check.html> points to outdated results (sometimes a previous version of the package) or a 404 error, and there's no corresponding binary for R-devel/Sonoma. Examples include 'bapred', 'aroma.affymetrix', 'b32', 'RPostgreSQL' (approximately 197 packages in total). Try asking Simon Urbanek about this problem. At least there's no deadline set right now: tools::CRAN_package_db() |> subset(grepl('^arcgis|^arcpbf$', Package)) |> _$Deadline |> is.na() |> all() # [1] TRUE -- Best regards, Ivan ______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
