Hey there,
> On Oct 11, 2014, at 10:30 AM, Hadley Wickham <h.wick...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> * dbConnect(RSQLite::SQLite(), "test") - this is the best way in my
> opinion. It doesn't require that RSQLite be attached, just DBI, which
> I think is the right approach. A DBI backend (in general) should only
> ever provide methods, not new generics, so it shouldn't need to be
> attached. In other words, you should _never_ need require("RSQLite").
I agree with that as a general guideline.
It might be worth considering that some backends may implement backend specific
functionality. While that brings it out of line of DBI, it always bums me out
to not have a way to escape the lowest common denominator functionality. So
perhaps there are cases for directly requiring a backend?
+ seth
_______________________________________________
R-sig-DB mailing list -- R Special Interest Group
R-sig-DB@r-project.org
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-db
