On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 01:21:20PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > Debian testing users cannot run the unstable binaries as libc6 is ahead on > unstable. We'll have to wait for libc6, or for Johannes' backports :)
Any idea when 2.6.0 will make it into testing? If I read the PTS info right, it's been hung up on some sort of circular conflict with rpy for some weeks. Thanks, Tyler > > Cheers, Dirk > > > r-base (2.6.1-1) unstable; urgency=low > > * New upstream version released this morning > > * debian/rules: As gcc-4.2 is now, unset suffix '-4.2' on gcc et al > * debian/control: Likewise, removed '-4.2' from gcc et al in Build-Depends > and Depends for r-base-dev and used versioned Depends (>= 4:4.1.0) > which are also suitable for backports and Ubuntu port -- and Debian > will get 4.2 anyway as it is the default in testing and unstable > > * debian/rules: Define FC=gfortran as the Fortran95 compiler for packages > > * debian/r-base-core.shlibs: Point libR.so and libRlapack.so to r-base-core > > -- Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mon, 26 Nov 2007 11:20:57 -0600 > > -- > Three out of two people have difficulties with fractions. > > _______________________________________________ > R-SIG-Debian mailing list > [email protected] > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-debian -- _/ _/ _/_/_/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/ _/ _/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/_/_/ _/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/ _/_/_/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ _/_/ _______________________________________________ R-SIG-Debian mailing list [email protected] https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-debian
