Thanks for this Johannes
Johannes Ranke wrote:
euclid: /etc/apt # apt-get -t unstable install r-base r-base-dev
Why did you use -t unstable? The distribution on CRAN for lenny is called
lenny-cran, not unstable.
Because that's what it said to do at
http://cran.r-project.org/bin/linux/debian
Anyway, tagging should not be necessary. What does
apt-cache policy r-base-core
tell you? It should list both R 2.7.1 from lenny and R 2.11.0 from lenny-cran.
% apt-cache policy r-base-core
r-base-core:
Installed: 2.7.1-1+lenny1
Candidate: 2.7.1-1+lenny1
Version table:
2.11.0-2 0
200 http://debian.yorku.ca testing/main Packages
2.11.0-1~lennycran.0 0
500 http://cran.R-project.org lenny-cran/ Packages
*** 2.7.1-1+lenny1 0
900 http://debian.yorku.ca stable/main Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
So, does this mean I should do
apt-get -t lenny-cran install r-base r-base-dev
(If the instructions on http://cran.r-project.org/bin/linux/debian
are out of date, maybe someone should correct them.)
--
Michael Friendly Email: [email protected]
Professor, Psychology Dept.
York University Voice: 416 736-5115 x66249 Fax: 416 736-5814
4700 Keele Street http://datavis.ca
Toronto, ONT M3J 1P3 CANADA
_______________________________________________
R-SIG-Debian mailing list
[email protected]
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-debian
