On Monday 23 April 2012 23:10:36 Don Armstrong wrote: > On Mon, 26 Mar 2012, Don Armstrong wrote: > > On Mon, 26 Mar 2012, Johannes Ranke wrote: > > > Dear Dirk, dear all, > > > > > > > | Perhaps an indication that this cran2deb stuff is very green? > > > > > > > > It has been inoperational for years as you could have noticed by > > > > looking at the version numbers of the packages you were getting, > > > > relative to CRAN. > > > > > > > > Use http://debian-r.debian.net, which is a pretty new, well done > > > > "reboot" of the same idea. > > > > > > This indeed looks nice - I wonder how hard it would be to make the > > > Debian stable/squeeze variant work... > > > > I need to fix a few things, and then I will be doing the rebuilds for > > stable too. Probably two weeks or so. > > Builds for stable are now happening, and should be flowing into the > archives in the next few days. Unfortunately, a lot of the newer > packages require R >= 2.14.0 in order to function, so they'll be > missing. If there's significant need for older packages (or if I end > up needing some) I may backport R 2.14.0 and add an additional > squeeze-backports archive, but I have no firm plans to do that yet.
Don, this sounds great! But why don't you use the R 2.15.0 backport to squeeze on CRAN? Am I missing something? Johannes > > > Don Armstrong _______________________________________________ R-SIG-Debian mailing list [email protected] https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-debian
