On 23 June 2013 at 20:34, ivo welch wrote: | ok, then let me rephrase: would it make sense to make atlas a higher | priority than default blas, even if it has been like this for over a
That would be a Debian-wide decision affecting _a lot_ of stake holders. You could start by asking the maintainer of the atlas package... | decade? having atlas as a depend that is overridden is pretty close | to not having a depend on atlas, at all. The 'default | better' formulation is standard among such 'virtual' packages. It among other things allows you to remove the default package. Just make it a habit to install Atlas (or OpenBLAS) along with R. Dirk | /iaw | | On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 8:11 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel <[email protected]> wrote: | > | > It is a suggested option, but with a lower priority than the default | > reference blas. And it's been like that for over a decade. | > | > Dirk | > | > -- | > Dirk Eddelbuettel | [email protected] | http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com -- Dirk Eddelbuettel | [email protected] | http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com _______________________________________________ R-SIG-Debian mailing list [email protected] https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-debian
