Hi Ravi,
Can you try sending this again, preferably as a text (not html) email with a
little bit more attention played to formatting? Empty lines between
paragraphs help. It is currently near impossible to read this.
If it is solely a r2u matter you could also open an issue at its github repo,
issues allow you to format in markdown and formated included output verbatim.
Many thanks, Dirk
On 15 November 2025 at 14:13, ravi via R-SIG-Debian wrote:
| Hi,I am grateful for the help that I received in setting up r2u on my ubuntu
system a while back. This is working fine. But I have some strange problem with
r2u on another PC that, as far as I know, I installed in the the same way.
| Let me first show the results in Rstudio from the successfully working Ubuntu
system:
| install.packages(c("broom", "curl", "data.table", "dbplyr", "dtplyr",
"evaluate", "forcats", "gargle", "ggplot2", "googledrive", "googlesheets4",
"haven", "hms", "igraph", "magrittr", "openssl", "pillar", "pracma", "purrr",
"Radviz", "ragg", "Rcpp", "RcppArmadillo", "reformulas", "renv", "rmarkdown",
"rvest", "stringr", "systemfonts", "textshaping", "tibble", "utf8", "vroom",
"xfun", "xml2"))Install system packages...Reading package lists... DoneBuilding
dependency tree... DoneReading state information... DoneHit
https://cloud.r-project.org/bin/linux/ubuntu noble-cran40/ InReleaseHit
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble InReleaseHit
https://r2u.stat.illinois.edu/ubuntu noble InReleaseFetched 0 B in 0s (0
B/s)Reading package lists... DoneBuilding dependency tree... DoneReading state
information... DoneGet:1 https://r2u.stat.illinois.edu/ubuntu noble/main amd64
r-cran-rbibutils amd64 2.3-1.ca2404.2 [940 kB]Get:2
https://r2u.stat.illinois.edu/ubuntu noble/main all r-cran-rdpack all 2.
| 6.4-1.ca2404.1 [623 kB]Get:3 https://r2u.stat.illinois.edu/ubuntu noble/main
all r-cran-reformulas all 0.4.2-1.ca2404.1 [132 kB]Fetched 1696 kB in 0s (0 B/s)
| Now, I will show the results from the Ubuntu system that appears to work OK,
but does not download anything:install.packages(c("broom", "forcats", "hms",
"magrittr", "openssl", "pillar", "rmarkdown", "vroom"))Install system
packages...Reading package lists... DoneBuilding dependency tree... DoneReading
state information... DoneHit https://cloud.r-project.org/bin/linux/ubuntu
noble-cran40/ InReleaseHit http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble-security
InReleaseHit http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble InReleaseHit
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble-updates InReleaseHit
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble-backports InReleaseHit
https://r2u.stat.illinois.edu/ubuntu noble InReleaseFetched 0 B in 0s (0
B/s)Reading package lists... DoneBuilding dependency tree... DoneReading state
information... DoneFetched 0 B in 0s (0 B/s)
| "Fetched 0 B" ? What can be the reason? The only differences that I can see
from the two versions are the following two lines in the latter:Hit
http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble-security InRelease
| Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble-backports InRelease
|
| The .libPaths for the latter are :> .libPaths()[1]
"/home/ravi/R/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-library/4.5" "/usr/local/lib/R/site-library"
"/usr/lib/R/site-library"[4] "/usr/lib/R/library"
| I don't have a problem with updating and installing ubuntu for the latter.
The problem appears to only with r2u.
| Is this a known problem? Please let me know if any additional information is
needed for troubleshooting.Thanks.Ravi
|
|
|
| [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
|
| _______________________________________________
| R-SIG-Debian mailing list
| [email protected]
| https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-debian
--
dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | [email protected]
_______________________________________________
R-SIG-Debian mailing list
[email protected]
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-debian
