On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Rich Shepard <rshep...@appl-ecosys.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Mar 2013, Philippi, Tom wrote:
>
>> I would look at packages bio.infer, paltran, fossil, and analogue, and
>> search to see if anyone has pushed them in the direction you want to go.
>
>
>   bio.infer is based on the EPA's EMAP-West (Environmental Monitoring and
> Analysis Program for the western states) and uses benthic macroinvertebrates
> and fish with selected water chemistry parameters. It uses the ITIS
> (International Taxonomic Identification System) to provide consistency in
> naming taxa to the lowest reasonable level.
>
>   Conceptually, one could assemble equivalent dataframes for diatom taxa and
> environmental conditions, but I don't know if ITIS has plants/algae in the
> system; problably does. However, the biota-environments relationships would
> be based on current conditions and whether this would be valid for sediment
> core data would need to be judged by a limnologist, not a stream ecologist
> like me.
>
> Rich
>

Rich: thank you.  I am not sure about the ITIS, but maybe my colleague
does.  I will ask him.

Thanks again.
Jay

_______________________________________________
R-sig-ecology mailing list
R-sig-ecology@r-project.org
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-ecology

Reply via email to