On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 at 10:21, Roger Bivand <roger.biv...@nhh.no> wrote:
>
> In the rgdal package, configure.ac has had : ${LDFLAGS=`"${RBIN}" CMD
> config LDFLAGS`} at least since 2012, so picking up LDFLAGS known to the R
> version installed. Very recently, users installing rgdal from source with
> R installed from RPM are seeing problems, such as those reported in this
> thread: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-geo/2020-June/028251.html
>
> The diagnosis by Bennet Fauber, that
>
> LDFLAGS='-specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld'
>
> is the problem, that LDFLAGS='-Wl,-z,relro -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,-z,now'
> works OK, and that the -specs= conflict with autoconf has not been
> resolved seems accurate to me (see also
> https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2018/03/21/compiler-and-linker-flags-gcc/,
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343892).
>
> I realise that the R RPM needs to follow RH/F standards, but has something
> happened in the RPM ecosystem recently to poison the -spec/autoconf
> relationship?Did something change in rgdal's flags from 1.5-10 to 1.5-12? Because the former installs fine. You can see in [1] that it fails since the last update. [1] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/iucar/cran/package/R-CRAN-rgdal/ -- Iñaki Úcar _______________________________________________ R-SIG-Fedora mailing list R-SIG-Fedora@r-project.org https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora
