Dear Melita,
I will try to answer your questions, but you will likely get better
feedback from the SAGA pros if you post them to the SAGA user forum on
sourceforge, see
http://sourceforge.net/projects/saga-gis/support
Dear saga and rsaga users and developers (Olaf, Alex, Victor..)<br><br>
I ran a small piece of code, testing the rsaga.pisr function for
calculation of potential solar radiation.<br><br>
<ul>
<li>Question is: if I calculate the rsaga.pisr for April 1th till April
4th, day by day, sum those and compare it with the rsaga.pisr calculated
for the range of days April 1-4th, there is an unexpected difference
ranging from (4.821417, 6.996113)kWh/m2. Can you help me to fix or
explain this?
Solar radiation was likely only calculated until April 3rd. I haven't
tried this out with rsaga.pisr, but some time ago in an earlier version
I found this in rsaga.solar.radiation, i.e. a different SAGA modules
that takes similar arguments:
In SAGA 2.0.2, solar radiation sums calculated for a range of days, say
days=c(a,b) actually calculate radiation only for days a,...,b-1 (in steps of
day.step - I used day.step=1 in this example). The setting a=b however gives
the same result as b=a+1, and indeed b=a+2 gives twice the radiation sums and
potential sunshine duration that a=b and b=a+1 both give.
This might explain your problem, but if you want to be sure you'd better
examine this in more detail by looking at different time spans,
especially one versus two days (does radiation increase by a factor of 2?)
<li>Second question is a technical one: when the R script calls
rsaga.pisr I can not have the SAGA gui opened since it crashes down. Is
that expected?
no it isn't, and I haven't experienced this problem with SAGA 2.0.7 on
Windows.
<li>Considering the latitude=user defined, why do we need it since the
latitude grid is defined?
not all the arguments are mandatory. you would specify either latitude
or in.latitude.grid
<li>And finally, there is a comment concerning the units in the
rsaga.pisr when you chose kJ/m2. If I'm not mistaken, the resulting grid
is actually in MJ/m2.
sorry I cannot confirm this, but it should be possible to determine that
by comparing average hourly PISR with the solar constant times 1 hour,
which will be higher but of the same order of magnitude as PISR if in
the same units. If that doesn't help, please follow up in the SAGA GIS
forums to find out if that's an error and issue a bug report if necessary.
I hope this helps
Alex
</ul>The R script and input grids are provided in
<a href="http://radar.dhz.hr/~melita"; eudora="autourl">
http://radar.dhz.hr/~melita<br><br>
<br>
</a>Thank you for the help and a nice tools that we can all use and
benefit from it.<br><br>
Regards,<br><br>
Melita Percec Tadic<br><br>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 16:52:57 +0100
From: Melita Percec Tadic <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: [R-sig-Geo] rsaga, radiation, rsaga.pisr
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-geo/attachments/20111125/2faacf51/attachment-0001.html>
--
Alexander Brenning
[email protected] - T +1-519-888-4567 ext 35783
Department of Geography and Environmental Management
University of Waterloo
200 University Ave. W - Waterloo, ON - Canada N2L 3G1
http://www.environment.uwaterloo.ca/geography/faculty/brenning/
_______________________________________________
R-sig-Geo mailing list
[email protected]
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo
