A description of the status now with regard to a prototype resolution is
online at:
https://rsbivand.github.io/ECS530_h19/ECS530_III.html
I'm planning to stream a talk about this at 09:15-11:00 CET on Tuesday 3
December. I need a volunteer to test the streaming link in advance during
next week. I'm unsure which technology to use for remote participants to
provide feedback.
Contributions/comments welcome!
Roger
On Fri, 15 Nov 2019, Roger Bivand wrote:
The development version of rgdal on R-Forge is now at rev 894, and is now
ready for trying out with PROJ6/GDAL3 workflows, and workflows that may
migrate within 6 months to modern CRS representations. The motivating RFC is
also updated to cover coordinate operations, the use of prepared
(pre-searched) coordinate operations, and should be read carefully by anyone
using rgdal::spTransform(). Note further that rgdal::project() will not be
adapted for PROJ6, and is effectively deprecated.
I'll be running reverse dependency checks, and may be bugging package
maintainers. I would really prefer that mainainers of packages using
spTransform() checked themselves and joined this thread or the associated
twitter thread: https://twitter.com/RogerBivand/status/1194586193108914177
Be ready for modern PROJ and GDAL, they are already being deployed across
open source geospatial software, like GRASS, QGIS, pyproj, spatialite etc.
Waiting, hopefully not in vain, for contributions.
Roger
On Wed, 13 Nov 2019, Roger Bivand wrote:
And this link explains the CDN proposal for grid distribution:
https://www.spatialys.com/en/crowdfunding/
Roger
On Wed, 13 Nov 2019, Roger Bivand wrote:
Because PROJ >= 6 and GDAL >= 3 change the way that PROJ strings
(representations of coordinate reference systems) are handled, steps are
being taken to find ways to adapt sp/rgdal workflows. A current proposal
is to store the WKT2_2018 string as a comment to CRS objects as defined
in
the sp package.
A draft development-in-progress version of rgdal is available at
https://r-forge.r-project.org/R/?group_id=884, and for sp at
https://github.com/rsbivand/sp (this version of sp requires rgdal >=
1.5-1). This adds the WKT comments to CRS objects on reading vector and
raster data sources, and uses WKT comments if found when writing vector
and raster objects (or at least does as far as I've checked, possibly
fragile).
An RFC with tersely worked cases for using CRS object comments to carry
WKT strings but maintaining full backward compatibility is online at
http://rgdal.r-forge.r-project.org/articles/PROJ6_GDAL3.html.
If you have other ideas or concerns about trying to use this mechanism
for
sp CRS objects, please contribute at your earliest convenience.
http://rgdal.r-forge.r-project.org/reference/list_coordOps.html shows
the
beginning of the next step, to query transformation operations to find
viable coordinate operation pipelines.
I'm assuming that the previous behaviour (transform without considering
accuracy with whatever is to hand) is not viable going forward, and that
we will need two steps: list coordinate operations between source and
target CRS (using the WKT comments as better specifications than the
PROJ
strings), possibly intervene manually to install missing grids, then
undertake the coordinate operation.
The fallback may be simply to choose the least inaccurate available
coordinate operation, but this should be a fallback. This means that all
uses of spTransform() will require intervention.
Is this OK (it is tiresome but modernises workflows once), or is it not
OK
(no user intervention is crucial)?
These behaviours may be set in an option, so that package maintainers
and
users may delay modernisation, but all are undoubtedly served by rapid
adaptation (GRASS 7.8.1 released yesterday, libspatialite, pyproj, QGIS
development versions all state that they list candidate coordinate
operations).
We cannot ship all the grids, they are very bulky, and probably nobody
needs sub-metre accuracy world-wide. Work in PROJ is starting to create
a
content delivery network for trusted download and mechanisms for
registering downloaded grids on user platforms. We would for example not
want Windows users of rgdal and sf to have to download the same grid
twice.
Comments welcome here and at
https://github.com/r-spatial/discuss/issues/28 or
https://github.com/r-spatial/sf/issues/1187
Roger
--
Roger Bivand
Department of Economics, Norwegian School of Economics,
Helleveien 30, N-5045 Bergen, Norway.
voice: +47 55 95 93 55; e-mail: roger.biv...@nhh.no
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2392-6140
https://scholar.google.no/citations?user=AWeghB0AAAAJ&hl=en
_______________________________________________
R-sig-Geo mailing list
R-sig-Geo@r-project.org
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo
