Roger Bivand wrote: >If you want simulations around >those point estimates, you can introduce spatial autocorrelation with the >lambda term, but lambda will not impact the predictions unless the model >was misspecified, I believe.
I'm not quite sure I understand why. If lambda does not impact the predictions, would its estimate not converge to zero? Is it wrong to do out-of-sample validation using the method used for in-sample fitted values in spautolm itself, where yhat = Xb + lambda W (y-Xb) ? (My background is in econometrics, not spatial statistics, so I apologize if this is obvious to those with a more acute understanding of spatial statistics). Thanks for your help, Bjarke Christensen _______________________________________________ R-sig-Geo mailing list [email protected] https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo
