That is right, Mark; the adjustment factor is dependent on the model used (Gaussian, it seems, in your case); e.g. for the exponential it would be 3 * a. And of course depends also on how you define practical range in the cases where the variogram reaches the sill asymptotically. -- Edzer
Mark Connolly wrote: > I think the range determined by fit.variogram is not the "practical" > range as mentioned in Applied Spatial Data Analysis with R. Do I have > this right? To get the range used for interpolation, I adjust the range > (eg. 3^0.5 * range)? > > _______________________________________________ > R-sig-Geo mailing list > R-sig-Geo@stat.math.ethz.ch > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo -- Edzer Pebesma Institute for Geoinformatics (ifgi), University of Münster Weseler Straße 253, 48151 Münster, Germany. Phone: +49 251 8333081, Fax: +49 251 8339763 http://ifgi.uni-muenster.de http://www.52north.org/geostatistics e.pebe...@wwu.de _______________________________________________ R-sig-Geo mailing list R-sig-Geo@stat.math.ethz.ch https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo
