Enviado desde mi HTC
----- Mensaje original -----
De: r-sig-geo-requ...@stat.math.ethz.ch
Enviado: Miércoles, 18 de Agosto de 2010 05:30 a.m.
Para: r-sig-geo@stat.math.ethz.ch
Asunto: R-sig-Geo Digest, Vol 84, Issue 18
Send R-sig-Geo mailing list submissions to
r-sig-geo@stat.math.ethz.ch
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
r-sig-geo-requ...@stat.math.ethz.ch
You can reach the person managing the list at
r-sig-geo-ow...@stat.math.ethz.ch
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of R-sig-Geo digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: lagsarlm with simulated data (Malcolm Fairbrother)
2. spRbind for spplot (Klaus Vormoor)
3. Temporal marked point process with time-varying covariates
(Mayeul KAUFFMANN)
4. Re: Best distance for a semi-variogram calculation (Scionforbai)
5. Re: lagsarlm with simulated data (Roger Bivand)
6. Re: spRbind for spplot (Paul Hiemstra)
7. Re: Temporal marked point process with time-varying
covariates (Roger Bivand)
8. Re: spRbind for spplot (Klaus Vormoor)
9. Re: spRbind for spplot (Paul Hiemstra)
10. Spatial data tower of babel (Barry Rowlingson)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 13:37:54 +0100
From: Malcolm Fairbrother <m.fairbrot...@bristol.ac.uk>
To: roger.biv...@nhh.no
Cc: r-sig-geo@stat.math.ethz.ch
Subject: Re: [R-sig-Geo] lagsarlm with simulated data
Message-ID: <7329c44a-01d0-4bb2-a980-4c7366f85...@bristol.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Dear Roger (and any other interested parties),
Thanks very much for responding. I tried adding the scale() argument you
suggested, but that didn't seem to make any difference. I've set a seed, and to
make it even more easily reproducible, I've loosely followed code from:
http://www.mail-archive.com/r-sig-geo@stat.math.ethz.ch/msg00799.html. The
contiguities (in addition to the data) are now generated directly using the
code below.
I'm still getting consistent upward bias for the Intercept, and otherwise
perfect
[No se incluye el mensaje original entero]
_______________________________________________
R-sig-Geo mailing list
R-sig-Geo@stat.math.ethz.ch
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo
