Dear all, I am currently fitting variograms using both the "autofitVariogram" fuction in the "automap" package and the "fit.variogram" function in the "gstat" package. I used "autofitVariogram" to fit variograms at first, and then I used estimated parameters as the input of the "fit.variogram" function. However, I found the estimated parameters are largely different. For example, the estimated parameters by the "autofitVariogram" function are
$var_model model psill range kappa 1 Nug 2.47 0 0 2 Ste 1.41 2506 10 the estimated parameters by the "fit.variogram" function are: model psill range kappa 1 Nug 0.74 0 0 2 Ste 3.03 1269 10 I tried the "exponential" model structure, and got similar results. I understand I probably cannot exactly same results, but I expect I can get similar results. Any suggestion? I appreciate your response and best regards, Kai __________________________________________________ 赶快注册雅虎超大容量免费邮箱? _______________________________________________ R-sig-Geo mailing list R-sig-Geo@stat.math.ethz.ch https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo
