Hey everyone,

I'm puzzled about a recent result, and I'm wondering if anyone can help explain 
it.

I am currently estimating a growth model with many controls by OLS. Looking at 
the residual tests I find that the Breusch-Pagan test points the presence of 
heteroskedasticity.
Moreover, looking for spatial dependence in the residuals using the Moran's I 
test I find that with 3 definitions of spatial weight matrix I cannot reject
the null hp of no spatial dependence while with 3 different spatial weight 
matrices I can.

Here the results in details:

Breush-Pagan Test:
BP=66.3478, p-value=0

Moran'I test on regression residuals:

1) W1 is binary matrix with a cut-off=660.8 km (row-standardized):
     Observed Moran's I=-0.02938, p-value=/0.57547/

2) W2 is the first-order contiguity matrix(row-standardized):  
     Observed Moran's I=0.1389, p-value=_0.00021_

3)  W3 is the second-order contiguity matrix(row-standardized):  
     Observed Moran's I=0.0694 , p-value=_0.00724_

4)  W4 is the matrix s.t each region has at least one neighbour- max distance 
1124.710 km -(row-standardized):  
     Observed Moran's I=-0.01286, p-value=/0.91883/

5)  W5 is the matrix where weights are 1/d_ij^2  with no 
cut-off(row-standardized):  
     Observed Moran's I=0.03239, p-value=_0.00350_

6)  W6 is the matrix where weights are 1/exp(2*d_ij)  with no 
cut-off(row-standardized):  
     Observed Moran's I=0.06847, p-value=/0.15462/


Therefore, my questions are:
- since I find evidence of heteroskedasticity shouldn't I look for 
aheteroskedasticity-robust version of the Moran's I? If yes, is there the 
possibility
   to implement it with the function "lm.morantest"?
- what should I conclude from such different results using different spatial 
weight matrices? It seems that the lower the number of neighbours is the higher 
is the
   probability of finding spatial effects. In this latter case how can I decide 
the "right" matrix? By looking at the AIC in the maximum likelihood?

Thank you very much!

Angela Parenti






        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

_______________________________________________
R-sig-Geo mailing list
[email protected]
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo

Reply via email to