lme fits using (restricted) maximum likelihood, and that requires a
covariance/correlation matrix that is non-singular, to be inverted each
iteration.

Under spatial correlation models, even the pure nugget model,
observations with identical location are perfectly correlated (as in:
the correlation of X with itself), and so result in duplicate rows/cols,
making the covariance/correlation matrix singular.

On 10/31/2010 11:21 AM, valerio.bartol...@uniroma1.it wrote:
> Dear list,
> it is probably a very simple question with an obvious answer, that 
> unfortunately I cannot find by myself.
> 
> Why I cannot fit a spatial correlation structure model if I've some 
> observations in the same location? Shouldn't the nugget account exactly for 
> this small-scale variability and measurement errors?
> 
> I'm using one of the correlation models in the generic function 'lme' 
> (package:nlme)
> 
> Thank you
> 
> Valerio
> 

-- 
Edzer Pebesma
Institute for Geoinformatics (ifgi), University of Münster
Weseler Straße 253, 48151 Münster, Germany. Phone: +49 251
8333081, Fax: +49 251 8339763  http://ifgi.uni-muenster.de
http://www.52north.org/geostatistics      e.pebe...@wwu.de

_______________________________________________
R-sig-Geo mailing list
R-sig-Geo@stat.math.ethz.ch
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo

Reply via email to