Dirk,

The first time I sent the mail , I got a mail saying that the list 
moderator has to review it for approval and was not posted. Thats the 
reason why I sent the mail again (3 days ago) which was posted (and I 
did get a answer from Charilaos and I also replied apologizing for 
sending it to R-GUI list instead of a R-general list).

But now, it seems that after 3 days the moderator has approved the 
earlier mail and posted it. I guess I should have canceled the previous 
posting to avoid this.

I hope that now it is clear that I am not making the same mistake again 
and its the same mail send 3 days ago that is being posted now.

Also, I would like to apologize to the members in the R-GUI mailing 
list, since they all must be getting the same mail 2 times and causing a 
inconvenience.


Regards,
Shweta.


Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> Shweta,
>
> Just three days ago, in a random act of kindness, Charilaos told you in no
> uncertain terms 
>
>    PS: Not sure what this has to do with GUI though, isn't that more  
>    appropriate to R-help instead of r-sig-gui?
>
> Which part of this was unclear?
>
> Charilaos also told you what you were doing wrong with your call to runif.
> You are still making the same mistake.
>
> Please go back and read his reply.  And please stop posting material that has
> nothing to do with R and GUIs to the list devoted to R and GUIs.  
>
> Thanks, Dirk
>
>   


        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

_______________________________________________
R-SIG-GUI mailing list
R-SIG-GUI@stat.math.ethz.ch
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-gui

Reply via email to