On Aug 31, 2005, at 5:11 PM, Kjell Konis wrote:
> I have both the gcc3.4.4 compilers and the gcc4.0.1 compilers. When
> I use 3.4.4 the configure script does not link against the blas in
> vecLib but it does when I use 4.0.1. However, I remember seeing an
> email here that said use the 3.4.x compilers unless you have a good
> reason not to (and the good reason was wanting a 64 bit build which I
> don't). Is this still the prevailing wisdom? I want a safe, stable,
> useable build. Is it better to use 3.4.4 w/o vecLib or 4.0.1 w/
> vecLib?
I do not know about vecLib, but I was recommended to use gcc 3, so I
would say it is still the prevailing wisdom. As I am using a stock
Tiger that would be gcc 3.3
Kasper
> PS Is it possible to search the r-sig-mac archives?
I do not know. If not we should look into google indexing them. I
have seen something like that with other mailing lists.
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
_______________________________________________
R-SIG-Mac mailing list
[email protected]
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mac
