On Dec 15, 2007, at 10:47 PM, Stephen Shiboski wrote: > Thanks a lot. I noticed that there is a binary for gcc 4.2.1 > (gcc-42-5531-darwin8.tar.gz) on the R developer's page. If this is > the same as what Apple provides, I can install this. >
It is built from the same sources... (Apple doesn't provide gcc-4.2 binaries for Mac OS X 10.4) > I also noticed that the code for dbeta.c hadn't changed since 2.5.1. > So, I just re-built 2.5.1 on the same machine and it makes & checks > w/o errors! > Ah, oh .. that is indeed interesting ... and does that build return all Inf for: dbeta(0, 0.9, 2.2, ncp = rlnorm(100)) If so, then I shall have a closer look ... Thanks, Simon > > On Dec 15, 2007, at 5:32 PM, Simon Urbanek wrote: > >> On Dec 15, 2007, at 6:49 PM, Stephen Shiboski wrote: >> >>> Trying to build R 2.6.1 on a G5 imac running OS X 10.4.11. I am >>> using >>> Xcode 2.4.1 and the gfortran (4.2.1) from r.research.att.com/tools/. >>> I am using following the configuration: >>> >>> ./configure --with-aqua --with-blas='-framework vecLib' --with- >>> lapack >>> --with-jpeglib --with-libpng >>> >>> >>> Builds fine, but make check fails as follows: >>> >>> running code in 'd-p-q-r-tests.R' ...make[3]: *** [d-p-q-r- >>> tests.Rout] Error 1 >>> make[2]: *** [test-Specific] Error 2 >>> make[1]: *** [test-all-basics] Error 1 >>> make: *** [check] Error 2 >>> >>> Here's the error: >>> >>> Error: dbeta(0, 0.9, 2.2, ncp = c(0, a)) == Inf is not all TRUE >>> In addition: Warning message: >>> In dnbeta(x, shape1, shape2, ncp, log) : NaNs produced >>> Execution halted >>> >>> I sucessfully built and checked 2.5.1 using the same set-up. The >>> only >>> thing that changed was the update to OS X 10.4.11 from 10.4.10. >>> >>> It builds & checks fine on my Intel machine with the same Xcode and >>> gfortran. >>> >> >> The issue is known and appears to be a problem with a specific >> version of Apple's compilers generating incorrect ppc code. It goes >> away when you update to Apple's gcc 4.2 (or probably also when you >> revert to older compilers, although I didn't test that route >> specifically). >> >> However, I'm surprised that 2.5.1 would work *if* you had exactly >> the same setup, because the dbeta source code didn't change since >> 2.5.1 at all. Are you 100% sure that you had exactly the same >> compiler versions as now? >> >> Cheers, >> Simon >> > > _______________________________________________ R-SIG-Mac mailing list [email protected] https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mac
