Thanks Brian, I think I might have to look into that idea.
Whilst picante::Kcalc() is speedy for 12 taxon trees, it's a little slow for the tree & data I actually want to test which has 11,449 tips (a pruned version of Hinchliffe & Smith, 2014 [1]). It takes nearly 3 hours to calculate a single Kcalc() for a tree this size on my machine, and I'd like to do 200-1000 random reps, not just one calculation. Cluster needed! [1] Data from: Some limitations of public sequence data for phylogenetic inference (in plants) Hinchliff CE, Smith SA (2014) http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.450qq [[alternative HTML version deleted]] _______________________________________________ R-sig-phylo mailing list - R-sig-phylo@r-project.org https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-phylo Searchable archive at http://www.mail-archive.com/r-sig-phylo@r-project.org/
