On re-reading, there are a couple of unclear referents or referent errors --
corrected below...

On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Eric Scoles <[email protected]> wrote:

> ...
>
>>
> Depends on what it's used for. If you only use them for yourself, that's
> fair use, as I understand it. If you sell them, then it's just like you
> showing movies in a bar without paying a studio or distributor for the
> privilege. Or playing CDs, for that matter. (Which is why so many bars have
> gone over to Satellite or Cable Radio and CD Jukeboxes: Because the vendor
> takes care of the fees they'd otherwise have to pay to distributors.) Or
> making photocopy versions of The Stand and selling them on the street
> corner. I fail to see how automated transformation for personal use differs
> in any way from any of those scenarios.
>

Last sentence ("I fail to see how automated transformation for personal use
differs in any way from any of those scenarios") should have been struck --
it was an artifact from an earlier version of the paragraph.




> ....
>
> Frankly, if it turns out that copyright law supports requiring them to pay
> for that, I would think it should be changed.
>


"that" referred to non-interpretive, automated transformation, not to
creative interpretation. Poor editing, again.


>
>

-- 
eric scoles ([email protected])

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"R-SPEC: The Rochester Speculative Literature Association" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/r-spec?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to