Thanks. I'm not out to make any points about the voting (and i'd totally
forgotten that Kage Baker died recently); I appreciate your insights on
this. The dynamics of that kind of selection process always interest me.

Someone in their CST* should chart nebula wins versus publication type over
time, though. That would be interesting, even (maybe especially) if there
didn't end up being a pattern.

--
*Copious Spare Time

.

On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 12:20 PM, SteveC <[email protected]> wrote:

> It is not customary for SFWA to report the Nebula votes. I don't know
> if they'll do it this year or not. They changed the voting system
> drastically, so there may be some pressure for it. I doubt it, though.
>
> My impression - and let me emphasize that it's only an impression - is
> that many people wait for the final ballot and then do their reading.
> Which may very well be colored by the fact that I do that. All of the
> nominees have been made available for many years so there is
> undoubtedly a habit built up of getting them online. I don't know how
> major an effect this is.
>
> Kage Baker died in January almost immediately after making her cancer
> public but before the nominations were due. Such an event almost
> always carries some sympathy votes. Whether that made any difference
> is also hard to determine.
>
> Nebula voters are a small percentage (30%?) of the active members.
> Nobody knows their composition or if they are representative or what
> they may be representative of. You're down to interpreting oracles
> when you try to guess what the ballots mean. Some people like this
> opaqueness, and some don't, but it's part of the culture.
>
> On May 16, 5:50 pm, Eric Scoles <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Interesting -- just only hit me on second reading that Novelette and
> Short
> > Story are both from online pubs, and Novella went to a book from a small
> > publisher (which, to make things even more interesting, it turns out is
> out
> > of print).
> >
> > Steve, does SFWA report stats on the votes? I'm particularly curious
> about
> > the Kage Baker novella since it's out of print. I guess you guys
> customarily
> > get access to the text, but how many people take advantage of that for
> all
> > nominees?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 10:55 AM, SteveC <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Novel
> > > The Windup Girl – Paolo Bacigalupi (Night Shade Books, Sept. 2009)
> >
> > > Novella
> > > The Women of Nell Gwynne’s – Kage Baker (Subterranean Press, June
> > > 2009)
> >
> > > Novelette
> > > “Sinner, Baker, Fabulist, Priest; Red Mask, Black Mask, Gentleman,
> > > Beast,”
> > > Eugie Foster (Interzone, Feb. 2009)
> >
> > > Short Story
> > > “Spar,” Kij Johnson (Clarkesworld, Oct. 2009)
> >
> > > Ray Bradbury Award
> > > District 9, Neill Blomkamp and Terri Tatchell (Tri-Star, Aug. 2009)
> >
> > > Andre Norton Award
> > > The Girl Who Circumnavigated Fairyland in a Ship of Her Own Making,
> > > Catherynne M. Valente (Catherynne M. Valente, June 2009)
> >
> > > Additional Honors
> > > During the ceremonies, Joe Haldeman was honored as the next Damon
> > > Knight Grand Master, while Neal Barrett, Jr., was honored as Author
> > > Emeritus. Vonda N. McIntyre and Keith Stokes were honored with SFWA
> > > Service Awards while the SFWA Solstice Award, bestowed upon
> > > individuals who have made a significant impact on the science fiction
> > > or fantasy landscape, was presented to Tom Doherty, Terri Windling and
> > > the late Donald A. Wollheim.
> >
> > > --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> > > "R-SPEC: The Rochester Speculative Literature Association" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > [email protected]<r-spec%[email protected]>
> <r-spec%[email protected]<r-spec%[email protected]>
> >
> > > .
> > > For more options, visit this group at
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/r-spec?hl=en.
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "R-SPEC: The Rochester Speculative Literature Association" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<r-spec%[email protected]>
> .
> > For more options, visit this group athttp://
> groups.google.com/group/r-spec?hl=en.- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "R-SPEC: The Rochester Speculative Literature Association" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<r-spec%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/r-spec?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"R-SPEC: The Rochester Speculative Literature Association" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/r-spec?hl=en.

Reply via email to