Jonathan Cool; indeed duplicating flows that way could improve latency since delivery can take place immediately, on a per-message basis.
alexis On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 4:14 AM, Jonathan Oliver <[email protected]> wrote: > Alexis, > That's a really good idea. Duplicating the message flows is probably the > best option because we're already taking the latency hit anyway to > duplicate. The bottom line here is there are some messages that can't be > lost. > _______________________________________________ > rabbitmq-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rabbitmq-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rabbitmq-discuss?hl=en.
