We're thinking about it. I was involved in the creation of MPL2, and one of the goals is exemplified by your use case. Please bear with us.
alexis On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 6:47 PM, RubyTuesdayDONO <[email protected]> wrote: > are there any plans to upgrade RabbitMQ's license to version 2.0 of the > Mozilla Public License? i've read that MPL 2 is compatible with the Apache > Public License, which would open some doors for folks implementing RabbitMQ > components for Apache projects, such as this prospective Apache Camel > component. > > ~ RNPG > > _______________________________________________ > rabbitmq-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rabbitmq-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rabbitmq-discuss?hl=en.
