On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Jay McCarthy <[email protected]> wrote:
> I wouldn't say there is or has been a policy. There's advice based on
> what the release process packages do.
>
> Generally, adding a new export or module is not considered
> incompatibility. (Although technically it is, because it could reduce
> the set of other packages that can be simultaneously installed.)
>
> Once you've committed to compatibility (by labeling a package with
> version "1.0"), then any incompatible change should end up in a new
> package/module, because at that point there's really no meaningful
> connection between the old code and the new code, except maybe similar
> purpose.
>
> I think in the case of gregor, since interface was removed, then it is
> "incompatible" in the sense we normally mean in Racket. I think it
> would come down to whether it was ever at 1.0 and whether it had
> actually been used by anyone.

To clarify: no interfaces were removed. Interfaces were added.

>
> Jay
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/CAKfDxxwo%3DisjfL5zKiEQMfqJ35zPS%3DSbCAkTMBbXiuZ5qe8FNA%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to