A module's syntax properties when fully expanded do a reasonable job
getting the requires and provides out. However, if I have something
defined (and provided) in a phase other than 0, it seems to be
missing. For example:
#lang racket
(require zordoz)
(define mod
#'(module foo racket/base
(#%plain-module-begin
(#%require (only racket/match match))
(#%provide x)
(#%provide (for-syntax y))
(define x 5)
(define-for-syntax y 6))))
(expand mod)
In the expanded module there is no syntax property for `y`, even
though it's provided for syntax.
Now, I could (and currently do) just recalculate this when I'm
compiling the module, but this seems a little bit silly to redo as the
macro expander seems to already have this information.
Is it possible to have all of a module's provides included when a
syntax object is expanded, and not just it's phase level 0 ones, or am
I missing something?
Thank you.
~Leif Andersen
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/CAAVaeEBWoYcN8ahAFcLgxNM3XGQnwhpv5Ay%2BP-%2BGKC2O2Mydkg%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
