FYI, given the single namespace of all Racket package names, I was
trying to figure out to what to do with old Scheme packages that were
still in use, but which had names that I didn't want to waste on archaic
APIs. I ended up just appending "-old" to the old package name.
http://www.neilvandyke.org/racket/rfc3339-old/
http://www.neilvandyke.org/racket/numformat-old/
BTW, I don't see a mechanism/process for keeping people from stomping
over particularly important package names (like "rfc<number>" or
"object"), with poor-quality interfaces/implementations.
Neil V.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket
Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/56D51202.9050209%40neilvandyke.org.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
