Ping. 2016-04-02 22:26 GMT+02:00 Jens Axel Søgaard <[email protected]>:
> Consider this snippet from scribble/html/xml > > (provide make-element) > (struct element (tag attrs body [cache #:auto #:mutable]) > #:constructor-name make-element > #:transparent #:omit-define-syntaxes #:auto-value #f > #:property prop:procedure > (lambda (e) > (unless (element-cache e) (set-element-cache! e (element->output e))) > (element-cache e))) > > (provide element) > (define (element tag . args) > (define-values [attrs body] (attributes+body args)) > (make-element tag attrs body)) > > I would like to provide the structure definition, but simply adding (provide > (struct-out element)) does not work, since element is not bound to the > structure id. > > An #:extra-id-name option for struct could solve this. > > Is there another way to provide the struct element without renaming the > element function? > > /Jens Axel > > > > > > -- > -- > Jens Axel Søgaard > > -- -- Jens Axel Søgaard -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/CABefVgwdePmoo556iL_%2BVj0d5_dpFuxZ-WR_bsP43nqVRhy_DQ%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
