On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 14:12:09 -0500, Stephen Chang wrote: > > > - Iteration over hash tables using `in-hash`, `in-hash-pairs`, > > `in-mutable-hash` and `in-mutable-set` have improved performance, up > > to twice as fast on microbenchmarks. > > This is not equivalent to my original text. How about: > > Hash table and set iteration, via both existing and new non-generic > sequences, is more performant, up to twice as fast on microbenchmarks.
Sorry. I tried to simplify them. Let's use your new text. Vincent -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to racket-dev@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/m2d1plza00.wl-stamourv%40eecs.northwestern.edu. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
