Something that has annoyed me about module+ since we first implemented it was that you couldn't make `module`s using it and you couldn't specify the module language (it is always `module*` with `#f` as the language.)
When I originally did it, I left that out because I didn't want the weight of it and for them to be inconsistent and when Matthew made the more beautiful implementation in #%kernel, he kept it that way. I've gone back and made the implementation support this via a `define-module+` and `define-module*+` form. Please take a look at this example file and let me know any opinions you have: https://github.com/jeapostrophe/exp/blob/master/module/ex.rkt In particular, should this be in racket? Should it be a package? Should it be in remix? Should have a different name, because obviously you know a better one? Jay -- Jay McCarthy Associate Professor PLT @ CS @ UMass Lowell http://jeapostrophe.github.io "Wherefore, be not weary in well-doing, for ye are laying the foundation of a great work. And out of small things proceedeth that which is great." - D&C 64:33 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/CAJYbDaktv5qPo%3D6ymSaG1QC03jWAHGzHrpNtdPb0403H8exSQg%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
