For example, over time, Slack.com will take users of one medium, and get
them to adopt Slack.com-specific other media. And this other media will
be used for some things that otherwise the email lists (and their many
mirrors) would've been. Racketeers who object to Slack.com would then
not be participating in community activity that had effectively been
moved to Slack.com.
I'm just noting one of the factors to be weighed, in case it had not
been considered. For me, it's mostly an on-principle objection to being
Slack.com's b-word. And an objection to promoting thinking like
Slack.com, to students and others.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket
Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/910bb911-23f5-fca8-a9a9-a7a8b09150e6%40neilvandyke.org.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
