I mean, PLT can't transfer the rights to most of Racket's source code,
as they (we?) don't own most of it. (There is not contributor license
agreement that I'm aware of. :) )

Of course, if Sam wants to do a round of getting people to agree on a
CLA to go along with the re-license...that would be a different
story...

~Leif Andersen


On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 5:11 PM, Neil Van Dyke <[email protected]> wrote:
> Will the SFC own any Racket copyrights or trademarks?
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Racket Developers" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/ad18b02c-4c20-35a7-dbbe-47f14ad741c5%40neilvandyke.org.
>
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/CAAVaeEAKgOgvi%2BBoygGgtsDqoQ5oykmNG%2BfN-5fJgNuUf%2BnCxA%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to