At Tue, 23 Apr 2019 10:18:05 -0400, Matthias Felleisen wrote: > Would it make sense to fork Chez?
While we have already forked Chez Scheme in the sense that GitHub reports at the top of https://github.com/racket/ChezScheme/, I think our fork is more usefully described as a set of patches to Chez Scheme. I've tried to keep the Racket-specific changes organized that way (with each patch recorded in a branch), and we sync with the main Chez Scheme repo regularly. This approach should continue working for the foreseeable future. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to racket-dev@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/20190423152122.7E5476500D3%40mail-svr1.cs.utah.edu. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
