> On Dec 3, 2019, at 2:01 PM, Matthew Flatt <mfl...@cs.utah.edu> wrote: > > Section 7.5, about the Haskell implementation, points out that the C > operator is more useful here than `call/cc`. That avoids the need to > set up an `abort` continuation, and it could replace an explicit > truncation operation. Then again, `call/cc` is still handy for various > purposes in Racket CS's Rumble layer to reflect on the continuation > without aborting.
Yes, I meant C not F. (Copying/appending the stacks is too expensive in most cases.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/C9AA4512-E856-42F6-82F0-2BBB551882BC%40felleisen.org.
