At Wed, 29 Apr 2020 16:45:55 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > Also, are stencil-vector implementations of HAMTs a new invention, or > is the some previous work on this we should mention?
"Stencil vector" is not a phrase anyone knows --- at least, I hope it doesn't mean something I didn't intend --- since I picked it for a new API in Chez Scheme. So, I'd drop "Stencil-Vector" from the bullet. For this one, > * The `call-in-continuation` form (due to Marc Feeley) allows the > elimination of unnecessary thunk creation. how about this?: * The `call-in-continuation` function (like Marc Feeley's `continuation-graft`) simplifies certain `call/cc` patterns by calling a thunk in a restored continuation. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/5ea9f7e0.1c69fb81.8ddd1.0118SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING%40gmr-mx.google.com.
