At Thu, 20 May 2021 07:56:15 -0500, Nathaniel W Griswold wrote:
> > Your 'pkgs-search-dirs configuration puts the new scope even before
> > user scope, so there's a kind of mismatch between the idea that it's a
> > non-user scope and the package search order. As you note in follow-ups,
> > the new and improved layering support is more the way to go.
> 
> 
> Oh, ok. I was just being careless i think. I think what i kinda wanted for 
> 'pkgs-search-dirs was `(#f "/opt/Racket 8.1/share/pkgs-system")` and not 
> `("/opt/Racket 8.1/share/pkgs-system" #f)`. I guess that would be priority 
> ordered {user, distribution, new-opt-system-scope}. That's kinda not what i 
> wanted either, though. I think what i really wanted is {user, 
> new-opt-system-scope, distribution}.
> 
> That's what most would be going for right? If so, is there a current good way 
> to do that ordering? Does the new stuff do it that way?

It looks like I was mistaken: The #f in a search list is replaced only
with the main directory, and the user directory is always put on the
front --- which is good, because that works better in general (but I
think some of the documentation is wrong, now).

So, the configuration is what you intended, after all.


Matthew

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/20210520071535.273%40sirmail.smtps.cs.utah.edu.

Reply via email to