Here's a minimal example of what I think is a bug: #lang racket
(define (blah #:foo foo #:bar bar) (+ foo 2)) (blah #:bar 3) Running it causes: blah: requires an argument with keyword #:foo, not supplied; x: expects type <x> as 1st argument, given: 'x; other arguments were: '#:bar 3 where the error information involving x is just bizarre. I'm guessing that's not intended behavior... Todd _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
