On Jun 18, 2010, at 10:32 AM, Jim Wise wrote: > I think the only real confusion comes in when you look at the iPhone and > think of it as a general-purpose computer -- an environment where you > are used to downloading your own software. A better comparison is to a > game console like a Nintendo Wii or a Microsoft XBox, where it has > always been the case that only software sold under a license from the > console manufacturer was available. In comparison, it's worth noting > that Sony experimented with allowing third-party OS software to run on > the PS3, and has since backed away from doing so.
To bring this closer to home: This reminds me of the rumor going around about two months ago, that Apple was going create an "App Store" for macs, meaning that only apple-approved applications could run on macs. It was just a rumor, but my thought at the time was that for a large class of users, this would be a welcome change. At the same time, it would completely hose Racket, and any other development group that didn't have a legal and marketing team to get their development environment approved. I think it's a good idea to be aware that the ability to compile and run arbitrary programs on the computers sold to us by Apple (or any other company) is not a constitutionally protected right, and that many if not all OS vendors would be delighted to move to a world where all applications required licensing fees and prior approval. My guess is that when this becomes feasible, it will happen. John Clements
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
