I've been unable to break JIT backtraces in our large legacy application
under PLT 4.2.5. This is great news, since the JIT should be a big win
for us. Thanks, Matthew and the rest of PLT.
Neil Van Dyke wrote at 06/27/2010 11:38 PM:
Thanks, Matthew. Sounds like I should experiment with my application
and try to break JIT backtraces with 4.2.5. Hopefully they just work
for me (and in production), because the JIT would be a big win for us.
Matthew Flatt wrote at 06/27/2010 11:23 PM:
The difference between JIT and non-JIT backtraces usually isn't so
big. Assuming that it's still a problem (i.e., it wasn't on x86_64
and long enough ago), then probably we need to fix something in the
JIT backtrace implementation.
--
http://www.neilvandyke.org/
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
