On Jul 21, 2010, at 2:51 PM, Evan Hanson wrote: > Also, is this the kind of thing that should be namespaced? In contrast to > other languages where namespacing is used heavily (sometimes even to a > fault), it seems that many scheme libraries are quite flat. Is this simply > left up to the user to manage, or does the module system take care of this, > or is there something else I'm missing altogether? Forgive the naïveté if > this should be clear to
I suspect that where you use 'namespace', I think we would say 'module'. Your module is a ~200 loc so that's a reasonable size. But if you wanted to, you could split into modules that are unsafe and modules that are 'safe'. On planet a library is more often than not a bunch of modules, with one module playing the role of entry point. ;; --- The one thing I noticed in your code is the use of let-loop to specify loops. Look up 'for' and try things like (for ((i (in-range (length args)))) ... ) You may even wish to for-loop over the args here (I think). _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
