On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Matthias Felleisen <[email protected]> wrote: > > (Nothing about futures. But may I recommend a nice and simple 'optimization': > > (cond > [(= 1 (length values)) ...] > > adds quite some complexity to a recursive function over a list. > I'd use > > (empty? (rest values)) > > instead.
This breaks on `null'. -- sam th [email protected] _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
